I. Function Introduction

Judgment items are standardized inspection units for quickly assessing binary states, supporting:

• Binary Judgment: Switching between mutually exclusive states (yes/no, normal/abnormal, etc.)
• Quick Operation: Completing judgments via click or swipe
• Risk Assessment: Automatic scoring linked to risk factors
• Standardization: Ensuring consistent inspection results

Core Functions:

• Simplify inspection processes
• Standardize evaluation criteria
• Quantify risk levels
• Support data statistical analysis

Access Entry:

1. Administrator logs into management backend
2. Navigation menu select: 【Inspection Standards】→【Judgment Items】
   

II. Add Judgment Items

1. Single Addition

Operation Steps:

1. Click "New" button on toolbar

2. Fill in key information:
   • Basic Information:
     • Item Name (Required, e.g. "Fire Passage Clear")
     • Normal Text (e.g. "Clear")
     • Abnormal Text (e.g. "Blocked")
   • Risk Assessment:
     • Risk Factor (Select associated risk type)
     • Score (Risk score for abnormal state)
   • Default Settings:
     • Default Selection (Normal/Abnormal)
     • Category Name (Classification management)
3. Click "Save" to complete creation

2. Batch Import

Operation Steps:

1. Click "Import" button on toolbar

2. Download Excel template

3. Fill according to specifications:
   • Item Name
   • Normal/Abnormal state descriptions
   • Risk factor code
   • Abnormal score
4. Upload file and verify
5. Process import results

Template Specifications:

Column Name	Requirement	Example
Item Name	Unique, non-repeatable	Emergency Lighting Normal
Normal Text	≤4 Chinese characters	Normal
Abnormal Text	≤4 Chinese characters	Fault
Risk Factor	Existing factor code	FIRE_001
Abnormal Score	1-10 points	5
Default Selection	Normal/Abnormal	Normal
Category Name	Existing category	Fire Facilities

III. Modify Judgment Items

Operation Steps:

1. Locate target judgment item
2. Click "Edit" button in operation column
3. Modify information:
   • Basic information (Name/State description)
   • Risk assessment (Factor/Score)
   • Default settings (Default selection)
4. Click "Save" to submit

Precautions:

• Associated inspection forms need synchronization after modification
• Original versions retained in historical records
• Core judgment items require approval for modification

IV. Delete Judgment Items

Operation Steps:

1. Locate target judgment item
2. Click "Delete" button in operation column
3. Confirm deletion operation

Restrictions:

• Items referenced in inspection forms cannot be deleted
• Items with historical inspection records cannot be deleted
• System core judgment items are protected

V. Best Practices

1. Design Principles

• Naming Conventions:
  • Use "whether" sentence patterns (e.g. "Whether intact")
  • Name ≤8 Chinese characters
  • Avoid ambiguous expressions
• State Description:
  • Normal text: Positive state (Normal/Intact)
  • Abnormal text: Problem state (Abnormal/Fault)
• Risk Assessment:
  • Low risk: 1-3 points
  • Medium risk: 4-6 points
  • High risk: 7-10 points

2. Application Scenarios

Scenario Type	Judgment Item Example	Normal State	Abnormal State	Risk Score
Equipment Inspection	Pressure Gauge Normal	Normal	Abnormal	7
Safety Protection	Protective Cover Intact	Intact	Missing	8
Environmental Safety	Passage Clear	Clear	Blocked	9
Electrical Safety	Grounding Reliable	Reliable	Unreliable	6

VI. Precautions

1. Design Standards

• State Opposition: Normal/Abnormal must be mutually exclusive
• Description Conciseness: Each item ≤10 characters
• Score Reasonableness: Match risk level
• Factor Relevance: Correctly bind risk types

2. Data Security

• Modification records permanently audited
• Associated changes automatically notified

3. Performance Optimization

• ≤20 judgment items per inspection form
• ≤3 level classification hierarchy
• Avoid circular references